During the 360 degree feedbackprocess, a participant (the person receiving the feedback) and their group of raters (those providing feedback) answer specific questions about the participant’s competencies and behaviors. Raters are chosen from those with whom the participant works day-to-day and typically include the person’s supervisor, direct reports, peers, and other coworkers. You know what your priority objective is and have a vision for the future. There may be very many different ways of getting there so this is the time to be creative and courageous and work with some selected champions. First work out what they are committed to and what they want from an intervention – listen hard, question carefully and check understanding. No need to challenge, just hear where they are – start with the key stakeholder and identify with that individual who else should be considered stakeholders. Get their wish lists, and ask them to prioritise so you know what their primary objective is too. Participants, managers, and other raters need to understand the purpose and exactly what they’re expected to do in the 360 process. Make sure participating individuals understand how best to approach collecting 360 feedback. Compared with psychometric profiles, 360 degree feedbackdata can appear very straightforward and easy to understand. In fact the reports are designed with that aim in mind – to be clear and easy for a non-trained reader to follow and reach reasonable conclusions. However, you do not want to be misled into thinking that this “ease of reading” means that the most useful and accurate interpretation will be made. What can you do if you cannot change people? You can be an agent of change in so many ways and can really make a profound impact on any organisation should there be certain conditions in place. The HR role is a unique one – it is often not clear what your accountability is or whether you are adding value, and if you said to an ordinary line manager that you were there to facilitate them changing you would not necessarily be welcomed or indeed get thanked. A 360-degree performance review is generally formalized. It's usually during a review period when employee pay and compensation are part of the conversation. While many employees find 360-degree feedback to be helpful, they often feel wary of 360-degree performance evaluations. But, that doesn’t mean 360-degree feedback has no place in yearly reviews.



A common route of upset in 360 degree feedbackdata is an unfulfilled expectation. For whatever reason, you expect someone’s opinion to be a certain way. That person may have said or done something to lead you to believe they had this opinion or judgment, or they may simply have omitted to say anything. More often these days, 360 degree feedbacksurveys are based on value models, although they are naturally based on behavioural translations of these values. There are generic leadership models available for use by a range of different organisations which can provide a well-tested framework and often a large database of useful comparative norm data. A reason for using 360-degree feedback interventions to measure aggregated individual change is to continuously evaluate and revise the development plans that were put in place by a prior intervention. Properly designed in a development systems framework, development plans would be integrated into the work itself, and the development of intended behaviors would be rewarded by the organization. When feedback comes from a number of individuals in various job functions, the possibility of discrimination because of race, age, gender, and so forth is reduced. The "horns and halo" effect, in which a supervisor rates performance based on his or her most recent interactions with the employee, is also minimized. Researching 360 feedback software is known to the best first step in determining your requirements and brushing up on your understanding in this area.

Designing A 360 Degree Feedback Project

For 360 degree feedbackto work, everyone has to participate. The drawback of a 360 is that it is labor-intensive. Every employee requires feedback from multiple others, resulting in everyone in the company giving feedback to multiple people. For this reason, management has to set clear expectations, should be accountable for the successful completion of the feedback, and should help to create a climate of consistency and fairness for all stakeholders. If you are one of the reviewers in a 360 review, remember that your feedback doesn't have to focus on weaknesses. I can’t stress this point strongly enough: You are actually helping more when you focus on your colleague’s strengths. 360-degree feedback for the high potential person can provide the perspective of the boss's boss, which often represents the reality of the organization at a different level of scope and complexity than the high-potential candidate is accustomed to. When organizations are faced with difficult decisions, such as reengineering or reorganizing, succession planning, placement, or other selection decisions, they need solid information. The 360 degree feedbackprocess has more reliability, validity, and credibility than any other performance assessment process. For example, an organization can develop intelligent decision systems for promotional decisions by tracking 360 degree feedbackresults over time. Such a tracking system can create valid selection criteria that ensure the organization places its employees in positions most suited to their competencies. The data coming from the 360 degree survey is potentially used by multiple users. These include feedback recipients, feedback providers, managers, coaches, and HR. Data should have both real and perceived credibility, meaning it is accurate and valid, and also seen as such. Evaluating 360 degree feedback system can uncover issues that may be affecting employee performance.

If anyone is missed out of the 360 process, it means the process is no longer 360 degrees. It also means that you can miss out on vital information that can help the employee receive a proper appraisal about their performance. 360 evaluations are meant to measure the perceptions of skills and behaviors that evolve and improve over time. The ideal situation is to collect feedback from peers throughout the year to measure how employees are developing their skills. This can of course be tied into the performance review, but it should not be used to assess employees on specific job related metrics. There is a very basic premise that assumes that people do things for good reasons. Everything anyone does, they do it for what seems like a good reason to them. Others may consider them totally daft of course, and you can have a situation where literally everyone around you thinks something different from you, so even if others think you should do something differently you will have good reason not to. If you did not have good reason then of course you would do things differently. There is a logic in the way people work. Often, there’s a big gap between how we think of ourselves and how others think of us. The use of 360-degree feedback can help to close that gap. For example, a leader might think they are doing really well at communicating, only to find that others don’t think they communicate clearly at all. 360-degree feedback provides a rounded and clear view of employee performance. While organizations continue to adjust to remote work and the lack of visibility managers encounter with virtual work, leaders should determine whether their structure accommodates peer-reviewing. The specificity/anonymity conundrum takes another turn when the idea of 360 appraisal is involved.

The Power Of Data

The power in 360 feedback is not just in allowing people to express their opinions, it is also in facilitating a listening beyond the norm. Most of us in HR know that listening is key and always good. You may also know that your managers are not that great at it. The key thing to do with negative data in a 360 degree feedbacksession is to make sure the participants keep the doors open and their mind open to what it might mean. Usually the truly upsetting conclusions are only answered in proper dialogue in real life, not looking at a personal 360 degree feedbackreport. As with many other aspects of feedback design, there are both benefits and downsides to coding aspects of a manager's feedback using color, underlining, or bolding in a 360 degree report. On the positive side, such highlighting can help a manager sort through large quantities of information more quickly, focusing directly on scores that show the greatest self/rater discrepancy or on scores that are particularly high or low in relation to norms. On the negative side, any mechanism used to direct the attention of managers to certain facets of the feedback may be taking evaluative responsibility away from the manager because the feedback report determines what is more and less important for the manager to focus on. Reviews are a critical part of any effective performance management strategy. And while traditional performance reviews — which allow supervisors to provide feedback to their direct reports — can be helpful, gathering feedback from multiple sources at different levels of the organization can be an even more effective approach to employee development. 360 degree feedbackis best designed as a co-creation with your key stakeholders and in the light of the bigger and most inspiring strategic initiatives. You can work with others and consult fully and you can allow the content to emerge in their language. In the meantime you can hold the integrity of the process, the structure and robustness of the frameworks and the survey itself. You can fulfil a commitment to providing a valid, robust and meaningful instrument. Looking into what is 360 degree feedback can be a time consuming process.

Since 360-degree feedback processes are currently usually anonymous, people receiving feedback have no recourse if they want to further understand the feedback. They have no one to ask for clarification about unclear comments or for more information about particular ratings and their basis. Thus, developing 360 process coaches is important. Supervisors, HR staff people, interested managers, and others are taught to assist people to understand their feedback and trained to help people develop action plans based on the feedback. 360 degree feedbackcreates high-quality assessments from internal and external customers, teams, project assignments, clients, and any other appropriate sources, which many organizations need in their TQM initiatives. To keep up with the rapidly evolving skill ecosystem, organizations need to be well versed with the basics of 360 degree feedbacksystems. This is the first rung of the ladder to creating a better work culture. Everyone needs a culture which makes employees more efficient and skilled, which ultimately leads to enhanced productivity as mentioned earlier. Clarity of purpose is perhaps the most important factor that can influence effective implementation of a 360-degree feedback system. Considerations about clarity of purpose break down into at least two issues: (1) how clear the organization is in communicating intended use and (2) how visible to employees the alignment between message of intent and actual practice is. At its core, the question becomes, How clear is the organization about the driving purpose for using the 360-degree feedback process? Is the feedback primarily for development purposes, or is the feedback to be used for administrative decision-making purposes such as performance appraisal evaluation and salary action? To assess a specific competency in 360 degree review, respondents need a rating scale and a list of statements (items) that can be checked. For example, we can write “John handles constructive criticism calmly,” and then ask raters to assess it according to a scale ranging from Seldom to Very often; also include a Don’t know option. Making sense of 360 degree feedback eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.

Survey Of Employee Satisfaction

Gathering feedback information for a 360 degree appraisal can be accomplished in a variety of ways: paper survey forms, optical scan forms (where respondents fill in bubbles with pencils), or automated data capture, such as e-mail, computer disk, or online modes. Positive Feedback helps an employee understand that what he or she is doing is working well. The more specific the feedback, the more likely the employee will understand and be able to replicate the desired performance. Make sure you get partners fully on board with how you really want the 360 degree feedbackto go, as they could end up being loud voices making a stand for a roll-out that looks very different from your vision. You may want to look for opportunities to educate and share latest thinking with these key leaders. You can source useful webinars or workshops for them or bring in consultants to run briefing sessions positioned as consultation exercises. Discover further details on the topic of 360-Degree appraisal instruments at this Wikipedia article.

Related Articles:

More Background Insight With Regard To 360-Degree feedback initiatives
Supplementary Insight About 360-Degree assessment objectives
Additional Information On 360-Degree assessment instruments
Further Insight About 360-Degree review projects
Extra Insight On 360 review initiatives
Further Insight About 360-Degree review initiatives
Additional Insight About 360 assessment processes